Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOSEPH OQUENDO SALADINO,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 10-30236
D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00535-BR
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Oregon
Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 15, 2012**
Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Joseph Oquendo Saladino appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 60-
month sentence for conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 371. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Saladino’s
FILED
MAY 21 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
10-30236 2
counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion
to withdraw as counsel of record. Saladino has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
