ERICK DANILO SOSA-SALGERO, AKA Daniel Sosa v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERICK DANILO SOSA-SALGERO,
AKA Daniel Sosa,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-70807
Agency No. A088-724-039
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 15, 2012 **
Before: CANBY, GRABER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Erick Danilo Sosa-Salgero, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for
review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an
FILED
MAY 17 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

immigration judge's denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our
jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency's discretionary determination that
Sosa-Salgero failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his
United States citizen child. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez–Castro v. Mukasey,
552 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir. 2009).
Sosa-Salgero’s contention, that the Board failed to properly consider and
weigh all evidence of hardship, does not raise a colorable due process claim.
Martinez–Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --