Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GUILLERMINA GONZALEZ DE
JIMENEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-73100
Agency No. A079-519-905
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 17, 2012**
Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Guillermina Gonzalez de Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying her
fourth motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FILED
APR 18 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
06-73100 2
In her opening brief, Gonzalez de Jimenez contends that she is eligible for
cancellation of removal.
By not raising any arguments concerning the BIA’s dispositive
determination that her fourth motion to reopen was numerically-barred, Gonzalez
de Jimenez has waived any challenge to that decision. See Martinez-Serrano v.
INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
