Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MAYRA MARTINEZ-PARRA,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-10109
D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00629-CW
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Claudia A. Wilken, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2011**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Mayra Martinez-Parra appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed
following her guilty-plea conviction for escape, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a).
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
JAN 05 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
11-10109 2
Martinez-Parra contends that her fully consecutive sentence is substantively
unreasonable. The consecutive sentence is consistent with the Guidelines. See
U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(a). In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) sentencing factors, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v.
United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --