Kenneth A. Friedman v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department;

10-17812Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 gen 2012

Testo completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KENNETH A. FRIEDMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 10-17812
D.C. No. 2:03-cv-01318-RLH-
PAL
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Roger L. Hunt, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2011**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Kenneth A. Friedman, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his
motion for partial summary judgment. We dismiss.
FILED
JAN 04 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-17812 2
We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court’s order “[did]
not dispose of all claims and [did] not end the litigation on the merits,” and is thus
not a final, appealable order. Williamson v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 160 F.3d
1247, 1250 (9th Cir. 1998); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (appellate jurisdiction over
“final decisions”).
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.