Haris Azizi v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The Honorable Donald E. Walter, Senior District Judge for the U.S.**
District Court for Western Louisiana, sitting by designation.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HARIS AZIZI,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Respondent.
No. 08-70449
Agency No. A72 143 638
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted November 14, 2011
San Francisco, California
Before: NOONAN and BEA, Circuit Judges, and WALTER, District Judge.**
Haris Azizi (“Azizi”), a native and citizen of Afghanistan, petitions for
review of the decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an
Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for withholding of removal
under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3). In his opening brief Azizi does not challenge the
FILED
DEC 08 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
agency’s finding that he is removable to Germany, or the agency’s denial of his
application for relief under the Convention Against Torture. These issues are
waived. Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996). Azizi seeks
only review of the agency’s denial of withholding of removal to Afghanistan in the
alternative. We review for substantial evidence. Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d
1173, 1178 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252,
and we deny the petition.
Azizi did not establish past persecution in Afghanistan. To qualify for
withholding of removal Azizi must demonstrate a clear probability that his life or
freedom will be threatened upon removal to Afghanistan on account of his race,
religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.
Lanza v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 917, 933 (9th Cir. 2004); 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3). Azizi
has not demonstrated that he is more likely than not to suffer harm greater than the
general population of Afghanistan at the hands of the Afghani government or a
group the government cannot or will not control. Singh v. INS, 134 F.3d 962, 967
(9th Cir. 1998); Lolong, 484 F.3d at 1179-80.
PETITION DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --