Narinder Singh Chandi, a.k.a. Narinder Singh, a.k.a. Tajinder Thind v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NARINDER SINGH CHANDI, a.k.a.
Narinder Singh, a.k.a. Tajinder Thind,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-72864
Agency No. A098-829-060
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 14, 2010**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Narinder Singh Chandi, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen
proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo due process
FILED
DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-72864 2
contentions. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny
the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Chandi’s motion to reopen
because Chandi failed to comply with the requirements set forth in Matter of
Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988), and the ineffective assistance he alleges
is not plain on the face of the record, see Reyes v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 592, 597-99
(9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --