Jorge Solorio-Servin v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JORGE SOLORIO-SERVIN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-71069
Agency No. A095-667-962
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 14, 2010**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Jorge Solorio-Servin, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law,
FILED
DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-71069 2
Castillo-Cruz v. Holder, 581 F.3d 1154, 1158-59 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the
petition for review.
Solorio-Servin’s contention that his conviction for violating Cal. Penal Code
§ 273.5(a) is not a crime of domestic violence under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i)
because the statute of conviction encompasses minimal, non-violent touchings is
foreclosed by Banuelos-Ayon v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1080, 1086 (9th Cir. 2010).
Solorio-Servin is therefore statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. See
8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --