Eloisa De La Cruz Bhagwani v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

08-72883Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 ott 2010

Testo completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ELOISA DE LA CRUZ BHAGWANI,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-72883
Agency No. A070-942-155
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 19, 2010**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Eloisa De La Cruz Bhagwani, a native and citizen of the Philippines,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying
her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and
FILED
OCT 28 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-72883 2
review de novo constitutional claims. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-
92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Bhagwani’s motion to
reopen as untimely because it was filed nearly twelve years after the BIA’s final
order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (motion to reopen must be filed
within ninety days of final order of removal), and Bhagwani did not show she
acted with the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see Iturribarria, 321
F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003) (deadline for filing motion to reopen can be
equitably tolled “when petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception,
fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence”). Bhagwani’s due
process claim therefore fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000)
(requiring error to prevail on a due process challenge).
Bhagwani’s motion to stay her removal is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.