Ngoc Anh Thi Le; Duy Phuong Le Do v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NGOC ANH THI LE;
DUY PHUONG LE DO
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-72681
Agency Nos. A046-497-155
A046-497-157
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 19, 2010 **
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Ngoc Anh Thi Le and her son, Duy Phuong Le Do, natives and citizens of
Vietnam, petition the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal
from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
FILED
OCT 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-72681 2
§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Damon v. Ashcroft, 360 F.3d 1084,
1088 (9th Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Le failed to
satisfy her burden of establishing that she entered into a good faith marriage, where
the evidence indicates Le and her former spouse had limited joint assets and only
lived together for four months. Cf. id. at 1088-89 (evidence of shared finances and
a year-long shared residency was substantial evidence that couple intended to
establish a life together at the time they were married); see also 8 C.F.R.
§ 216.5(e)(2)(i)-(iv).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --