Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ISAID HERRERA,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-10481
D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00595-DCB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Isaid Herrera appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his
guilty-plea conviction for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1326.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
OCT 04 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
09-10481 2
Herrera contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The
district court did not procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984,
993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, in light of the totality of the
circumstances, the district court’s sentence at the low end of the Guidelines range
is substantively reasonable. See id.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
