Vladimir B. Belinski v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VLADIMIR B. BELINSKI; SVETLANA
B. BELINSKI; ANGELINA V.
BELINSKI; VLADIMIR V. BELINSKI;
YULIA V. BELINSKI; DIANNA V.
BELINSKI; DENNIS V. BELINSKI,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-73761
Agency Nos. A078-668-643
A078-668-644
A078-668-645
A078-668-646
A078-668-647
A078-668-648
A078-668-649
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 15, 2010**
Portland, Oregon
Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Vladimir B. Belinski, his wife, Svetlana Belinski, and their children,
Angelina Belinski, Vladimir V. Belinski, Yulia Belinski, and Dennis Belinski
FILED
JUL 22 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

(collectively “the Belinskis”) are natives and citizens of Tajikistan and citizens of
Israel. Their youngest child, Dianna Belinski, is a native and citizen of Canada.
The Belinskis appeal the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming the
Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of
removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the Belinskis’ petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that the Belinskis did not
establish that the Israeli government was unable or unwilling to control their
alleged persecutors. See Robleto-Pastora v. Holder, 567 F.3d 437, 442 (9th Cir.
2009), amended by 591 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 2009). We therefore deny the
Belinskis’ petition for review because the IJ’s decision, affirmed without opinion
by the Board of Immigration Appeals, is supported by substantial evidence.
PETITION DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --