Maria Kimble, a.k.a. Maria Trinidad Medrano Corona v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA KIMBLE, a.k.a. Maria Trinidad
Medrano Corona,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74316
Agency No. A079-359-985
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Department of Homeland Security
Submitted June 29, 2010**
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Maria Kimble, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions from a United States
Immigration and Customs Enforcement decision to reinstate her prior exclusion
order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions
FILED
JUL 09 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-74316 2
of law and due process claims. Garcia de Rincon v. Dep't Homeland Security, 539
F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.
The reinstatement of Kimble’s removal order did not violate her due process
rights. See Morales-Izquierdo v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 484, 497 (9th Cir. 2007) (en
banc) (“Reinstatement of a prior removal order – regardless of the process afforded
in the underlying order – does not offend due process because reinstatement of a
prior order does not change the alien’s rights or remedies.”).
Kimble’s remaining constitutional contentions are not persuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --