Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny
Salsman’s request for oral argument.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES SALSMAN,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR
REGULATORY COMMISSION,
Respondent.
No. 08-74043
NRC No. PRM-20-26
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
James Salsman petitions pro se for review of the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission’s (“NRC”) decision denying his petition for rulemaking to amend
NRC’s regulations concerning the environmental and exposure limits for heavy
FILED
JUN 14 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
08-74043 2
metal radionuclides, and to reclassify uranium solubility. See 10 C.F.R. Part 20.
We dismiss the petition for review for lack of Article III standing because Salsman
did not demonstrate that he suffered an “injury in fact” that is concrete and
particularized and actual or imminent. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504
U.S. 555, 560 (1992).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
