Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
EOH/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALONZO L. TAYLOR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JIM HAMLET,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 08-15042
D.C. No. CV-03-00592-MMC
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010**
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Alonzo L. Taylor appeals from the district court’s
order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
FILED
MAR 29 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
EOH/Research 08-15042 2
Taylor contends that the district court erred when it determined that he
entered his guilty plea knowingly and voluntarily. Any error that may have
occurred in failing to notify Taylor of the mandatory restitution fine did not have a
“substantial and injurious effect or influence” on the outcome of the case. See
Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 637 (1993).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
