Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
AK/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARMON E. WARREN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 07-16463
D.C. No. CV-06-01328-OWW
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010**
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Carmon E. Warren appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging a
prison disciplinary proceeding. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253,
FILED
MAR 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
AK/Research 07-16463 2
and we affirm.
Warren contends that the district court erred by dismissing his petition for
lack of jurisdiction. This contention lacks merit because Warren has not
demonstrated that the reversal of his disciplinary conviction is likely to accelerate
his release from prison. See Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 859 (9th Cir. 2003).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
