Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
IH/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PEDRO LOPEZ-SANTIAGO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-70104
Agency No. A077-166-335
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Pedro Lopez-Santiago, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellation of
FILED
FEB 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
IH/Research 07-70104 2
removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we dismiss the
petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s dispositive determination that Lopez-
Santiago is ineligible for cancellation of removal as an alien who has been
convicted of an offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2) because Lopez-Santiago failed
to exhaust this issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677
(9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
