Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
AK/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUVENILE FEMALE,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-10078
D.C. No. 4:05-cr-01053-DCB
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 11, 2010**
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Juvenile Female appeals from the sentence imposed following the revocation
of juvenile delinquent supervision. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 and we affirm.
FILED
JAN 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
AK/Research 09-10078 2
Juvenile Female contends that the district court erred by imposing a sentence
contrary to the rehabilitative goals of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act.
(“FJDA”). The record reflects that the district court adequately considered the
relevant factors within the FJDA while accounting for the particularized
rehabilitative needs of Juvenile Female, and imposed a sentence that was the least
restrictive means to meet those needs. Cf. United States v. Juvenile, 347 F.3d 778,
787-90 (9th Cir. 2003).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
