Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
MVD/Inventory
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GUADALUPE MARTINEZ
VALERIANO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74647
Agency No. A095-304-155
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 15, 2009**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Guadalupe Martinez Valeriano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro
se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order denying her motion to
reopen removal proceedings.
FILED
DEC 28 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 MVD/Inventory 08-74647
We lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s denial of Martinez Valeriano’s
motion to reopen, which introduced further evidence and argument regarding
hardship to her United States citizen children. See Fernandez v. Gonzales,
439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir. 2006) (explaining that § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) bars
jurisdiction when question presented in motion to reopen is essentially the same
hardship ground originally decided).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
