United States of America v. Steven Kinney

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
SZ/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVEN KINNEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 08-10306
D.C. No. 2:03-cr-00080-LDG
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 17, 2009**
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Steven Kinney appeals pro se from the district court’s May 29, 2008, order
denying his requests for documents and to unseal a portion of the record. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
DEC 17 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

SZ/Research 08-10306 2
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Kinney’s post-
judgment motions.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --