Mayra Dominguez-Cortez v. Michael B. Mukasey

08-2092Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30 ott 2009

Testo completo

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-1382
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Northern
* District of Iowa.
Luis Trujillo-Mendez, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: October 1, 2009
Filed: October 6, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Luis Trujillo-Mendez appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he
pleaded guilty to illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b). His counsel
has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), arguing that the court abused its discretion in denying a downward departure
under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0. Because the district court acknowledged its authority to
depart, and nothing in the record indicates that the refusal to do so was based upon an
unconstitutional motive, the denial of Trujillo-Mendez’s motion for a downward
1The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

departure is unreviewable. See United States v. Morell, 429 F.3d 1161, 1164 (8th Cir.
2005). We also conclude that Trujillo-Mendez’s sentence is not unreasonable. See
United States v. Radtke, 415 F.3d 826, 845-46 (8th Cir. 2005).
We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,
80 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s
motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.