Testo completo
1The Honorable John B. Jones, Senior United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-1585
___________
Daniel Hanic, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Jeff Bloomberg, Secretary D.O.C.; * District of South Dakota.
Douglas Weber, Warden SDSP; *
John and Jane Doe, Inmate Account * [UNPUBLISHED]
Employees, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: October 19, 2000
Filed: October 24, 2000
___________
Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
South Dakota inmate Daniel Hanic appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging South Dakota
Department of Corrections Policy No. 1B.10. In addition to raising a procedural
challenge to the application of the policy to him, Hanic claimed that the policy violated
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
substantive due process and his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures.
Having conducted a de novo review, we reject Hanic’s challenge for the reasons
explained in the district court’s thorough opinion. See Tillman v. Lebanon County
Correctional Facility, 221 F.3d 410, 421-22 (3d Cir. 2000); Parrish v. Mallinger, 133
F.3d 612, 615 (8th Cir. 1998); Mahers v. Halford, 76 F.d 951, 954-56 (8th Cir. 1996),
cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1091 (1997).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
