Sound Check, Inc. v. American Federation

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2820
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the District
v. * of Nebraska.
*
Melissa R. Ortiz, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: February 7, 2000
Filed: February 10, 2000
___________
Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Melissa R. Ortiz appeals her sentence for conspiring to distribute
methamphetamine. For reversal, Ortiz raises various challenges to the government's
failure to move for a sentencing departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
§ 5K1.1, p.s. (1999), and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e).
We reject these contentions. Ortiz did not complain at sentencing about the lack
of a departure motion, the plea agreement preserved the government's discretion
whether to move for departure, and Ortiz made no substantial threshold showing the

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
government acted irrationally, in bad faith, or based on an unconstitutional motive. See
United States v. Kelly, 18 F.3d 612, 617-18 (8th Cir. 1994); United States v. Romsey,
975 F.2d 556, 558 (8th Cir. 1992); United States v. Oransky, 908 F.2d 307, 309 (8th
Cir. 1990). As to Ortiz's sentencing-continuance argument, we note the district court
granted her motion for a continuance.
We also reject Ortiz's contention that she should receive a downward departure
under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.0, p.s. (1999) based on her post-
offense rehabilitation, youth, minor role, and parental obligations--a departure she did
not seek at the time of her sentencing. Cf. United States v. Favara, 987 F.2d 538, 540
(8th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-- 2 of 2 --