Corey A. Askew v. CROPSEY, Sergeant; BUSH, Lieutenant

We recognize that Askew did claim that the defendants knew the exhaust fan would1
malfunction, despite the district court’s statement to the contrary. We nevertheless find the district
court’s resolution of Askew’s claims persuasive.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 11a0184n.06
No. 09-1590
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
COREY A. ASKEW,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CROPSEY, Sergeant; BUSH, Lieutenant,
Defendants-Appellees.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Before: SUHRHEINRICH, COLE, and COOK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. Corey A. Askew appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to defendants Sergeant Daniel Cropsey and Lieutenant Jeremy Bush and dismissing his
state-law claims. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court
determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion. Rather, we adopt
the reasoning of the district court (and the magistrate judge in those instances where the district court
did so) on those issues raised in this appeal and affirm the district court’s judgment. To the extent1
that Askew argues issues not raised in the district court, we deem those arguments forfeited. See
Dealer Computer Servs., Inc. v. Dub Herring Ford, 623 F.3d 348, 357 (6th Cir. 2010).

-- 1 of 1 --