Testo completo
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-41347
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
REYNALDO ACOSTA-GOMEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:99-CR-41-ALL
- - - - - - - - - -
August 22, 2000
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reynaldo
Acosta-Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Acosta has received copies of counsel’s motion and brief, but he
has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s
Anders brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
