Testo completo
* Judge, U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by
designation.
**Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-60798
TRAYCEE S. SCOTT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
CENTURY CELLUNET, JANECE YOUNG, ROBERT BURGESS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
(1:97-CV-565-RG)
February 9, 2000
Before POLITZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,* Judge.
PER CURIAM:**
After reviewing the record and considering the briefs and
argument of counsel, we are persuaded that the district court
correctly granted summary judgment in this case. Assuming without
deciding that the plaintiff established a prima facie case, she
produced no summary judgment evidence that tended to refute the
non-discriminatory reasons the employer gave for refusing to
promote her or tending to show that those reasons were pretextual.
On Scott’s disparate wage claim, the employer rectified the seven
-- 1 of 2 --
2
cent per hour disparity as soon as it was called to the employer’s
attention and plaintiff established no monetary loss from this
disparity.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
