Testo completo
*Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that
have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on
the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless
expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."
Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published.
1Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
2In view of the above disposition of this appeal, the
appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, received after this
opinion was filed, is DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 94-41091
Summary Calendar
_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROSENDO ENRIQUE CEDENO-ACERETO,
f/k/a Enrique Acereto,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas
(1:93 CR 124 2)
_________________________________________________________________
August 28, 1995
Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Upon motion of the appellant, Enrique Cedeno-Acereto, and in
view of the satisfactory Anders brief, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), having
been duly submitted by appointed counsel demonstrating the lack of
merit in this appeal,1 this appeal is, with prejudice,
D I S M I S S E D.2
-- 1 of 1 --
