(caption unavailable)

91-4470Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit4 feb 2004

Testo completo

* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no
precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-
settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on
the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________
No. 91-4470
Summary Calendar
_______________
FELIPE EPITACIO CHEW-VILLASANA,
Petitioner,
VERSUS
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
_________________________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Immigration and Naturalization Service
(A27 648 180)
_________________________
(November 30, 1992)
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
On December 19, 1991, this court denied the petition for
review in an unpublished opinion. After our mandate had issued,
the County Court of Duval County, Texas, issued an order in State

-- 1 of 2 --

2
v. Felipe Chew regarding a prior criminal conviction of the
petitioner. The Supreme Court has vacated our judgment and
remanded for further consideration in light of the new state court
order. Chew-Villasana v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 61
U.S.L.W. 3284 (U.S. Oct. 13, 1992) (No. 91-7800).
In order to permit the Immigration and Naturalization Service
to consider the issue of the petitioner's deportation in light of
the intervening state court action and Supreme Court's order, we
REMAND to that agency for further appropriate proceedings.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.