Keivani v. Gonzales

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-60227
Summary Calendar
FARIBA KEIVANI,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A95 534 120
--------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Fariba Keivani petitions for review of the decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirming the
immigration judge’s decision to deny her application for asylum,
withholding of deportation, and relief under the Convention
against Torture. She contends that the immigration judge erred
in making an adverse credibility finding. Keivani maintains that
the immigration judge evinced bias against her, misunderstood her
testimony, ignored or discounted documentary evidence, and
wrongly found inconsistencies in her testimony and in her written
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 3, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 04-60227
-2-
statements. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and
conclude that Keivani has not established that the record compels
that the credibility ruling be overturned. See Lopez de Jesus v.
INS, 312 F.3d 155, 161 (5th Cir. 2002).
Keivani contends that she has established her eligibility
for asylum, withholding of deportation, and relief under the
Convention against Torture. In light of the adverse credibility
determination, we need not consider whether Keivani has
established an entitlement to such relief. See Chun v. INS, 40
F.3d 76, 79 (5th cir. 1994).
PETITION DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --