Gore v. Experian Information

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 2, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-11295
Summary Calendar
TERRENCE GORE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:03-CV-2949
--------------------
Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Terrence Gore (hereinafter “Gore”), a college student, small
business owner, and frequent pro se and informa pauperis
litigant, brought this suit in Texas state court as one of a
series of cases against Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
(hereinafter “Experian”) seeking to suppress reporting of his
poor credit history and damages resulting therefrom. Experian
removed the case to federal court. Gore moved to remand the case
to state court but Judge Barefoot Sanders denied the motion to

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 04-11295
-2-
remand. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment and in
September 2004, Judge Sanders denied Plaintiff’s motion for
summary judgment and granted summary judgment to Experian on all
counts. Gore appeals to this court.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the
record excerpt and relevant portions of the record itself. For
the reasons stated by Judge Sanders in each of the Memorandum and
Orders as to which Gore sought appellate review in this appeal,
we affirm the rulings of Judge Sanders therein and we affirm the
final judgment entered by Judge Sanders on September 7, 2004.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --