Testo completo
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-50271
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JARED LAMONT HALL,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. MO-01-CR-139-3
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Jared Lamont Hall has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although he was notified of
counsel’s motion, Hall has filed no response.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal with respect to Hall’s
conviction. As part of his plea agreement, Hall validly waived
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 03-50271
-2-
his right to directly appeal his sentence on any ground. See
United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994).
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 2 of 2 --
