Testo completo
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 23, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-30143
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMAR ANDERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 02-CR-96-ALL-F
--------------------
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jamar Anderson appeals his conviction for being a felon in
possession of a firearm. He argues that the district court erred
in denying his motion to suppress by considering his prior
conviction when making a credibility determination between the
conflicting testimony of a defense witness and two police officers.
We find nothing in the district court’s order that supports an
inference that the inclusion of the term “convicted felon” suggests
any impropriety.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
