Testo completo
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-50039
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHE ESTRADA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-00-CR-94-4
--------------------
November 5, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Che Estrada on appeal has
moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Estrada received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief and has filed a brief in response.
Estrada’s motions for new counsel and to proceed pro se on appeal
are DENIED. Our independent review of the briefs and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 02-50039
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 2 of 2 --
