Testo completo
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
March 3, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40905
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUANITA ROJAS-URESTE,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
(L-01-CR-1203-ALL)
Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Pursuant to this court’s 20 May 2003 order, (1) a transcript
of the rearraignment proceeding having been obtained and (2)
Juanita Rojas-Ureste’s pro se request for substitution of counsel
having been denied, counsel appointed to represent Rojas-Ureste has
renewed his request for leave to withdraw and has filed an amended
brief. Rojas-Ureste has not responded. This satisfies the
procedures mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
-- 1 of 2 --
No.
-2-
2
Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
-- 2 of 2 --
