United States v. Meadows

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 17, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-11160
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROSCOE DUNGEE MEADOWS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:02-CR-34-1
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Roscoe Dungee Meadows appeals his 36-month sentence for wire
fraud. 18 U.S.C. § 1343. He argues that the district court
clearly erred in calculating the amount of loss to Cornerstone
Financial Services (CFS). Meadows argues that the court erred in
assessing no value to the two wrecked trucks that were
repossessed. In light of CFS’s unsuccessful attempts to sell the
parts of the wrecked trucks, the district court’s determination

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-11160
-2-
that the amount of loss was more than $20,000 was plausible and
thus not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Ismoila, 100
F.3d 380, 396 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --