Testo completo
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10958
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICARDO GONZALEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:00-CR-266-8-X
--------------------
March 1, 2002
Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Attorney Adrianna Martinez Goodland appointed to represent
Ricardo Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) has requested leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Gonzalez has not responded to the motion. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 2 --
No.
-2-
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
