Summary Calendar EZZAT EMAJD POUR v. James Wilson

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-60737
Summary Calendar
EZZAT E MAJD POUR
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
JAMES WILSON; MIKE MOORE; R B FLOWERS; SHEA LEATHERNMAN; E M
HOOD, JR.; BARBARA T JEPSON; NICHOLAS HOWARD; TUNICA HOSPITAL
INC; EDWIN ORR; BILLY RUSSELL; PARIS PRINCE; JAMES E DANIEL;
LARRY BLACK; JEAN BLACK; BLACK & MARLOW INCORPORATION; NORTH
MISSISSIPPI HEALTH CARE CORP, Administration and Board Members;
THOMAS E STEVENS; JOSEPH JOHNSON; FRANK MORGAN; STAN INGRAM;
GEORGE C HAMILTON, JR; BRUCE C ATKINSON; ARTHUR A DERRICK;
ANTHONY BRADSHAW; W W WALLEY; ROBERT B TOWNS; WALTER H ROSE; JOHN
R SHELL; RODRIGO GALVEZ; WILLIAM MARTIN WOOD; MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL
BOARD, and Members; DAN FITZPATRICK; HARLAN HOSPITAL BOARD
MEMBERS; ROBERT BONNER; UNKNOWN MILLER, Agent; CHARLES R JENKINS;
PAUL R MOORE, SR; ALBERT L MEENA
Defendants - Appellees
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:99-CV-869-WS
--------------------
June 22, 2001
Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Ezzat E. Majd Pour, M.D. (Pour) filed this action
against numerous defendants, seeking monetary damages and
injunctive relief on claims of conspiracy to commit and
commission of hate crimes, invasion of privacy, libel, slander,

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 00-60737
-2-
and murder. The district court dismissed the action with
prejudice on grounds of res judicata and claim preclusion. The
district court also enjoined Pour from filing any other papers in
that court without prior leave of court. We AFFIRM,
substantially for the reasons stated in the district court’s
memorandum opinion, Pour v. Moore, No. 3:99-CV-869WS (S.D. Miss.
Aug. 31, 2000)(unpublished).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the requests of appellees Orr,
Hamilton, Wood, and Howard for this court to broaden the district
court’s injunction are DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pour’s motions to strike appellee
Orr’s brief, to file an amended reply brief to Orr’s brief, and
to file a motion as a supplement to Pour’s own reply brief, are
DENIED.
AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --