Testo completo
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40746
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROLAND ROJAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-99-CR-1122
--------------------
April 12, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Roland Rojas has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rojas has received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a pro se brief
of his own. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the
record discloses no nonfrivolous point for appeal. Accordingly,
the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 00-30485
-2-
Although Rojas did not file a response brief, he has filed a
motion for appointment of counsel. That motion is DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
