Testo completo
1 District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting
by designation.
2 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
___________________________
No. 00-31289
___________________________
CHERYL SADLER,
Plaintiff,
VERSUS
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION; ET AL,
Defendants,
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION; SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY,
Defendants-Intervenor Defendants-Appellants,
VERSUS
AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendant-Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee.
______________________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of Louisiana, Baton Rouge
No. 98-CV-456-B
________________________________________________
November 6, 2001
Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and VANCE,1
District Judge.
PER CURIAM:2
-- 1 of 2 --
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Whirlpool Corporation, et al, challenge the district court’s
order granting American National Property and Casualty Company’s
motion to remand its action back to the Louisiana 19th Judicial
District Court. The district court expressly based its August
24, 2000 order upon 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Section 1447(d) forbids
this Court from reviewing orders remanding actions under
subsection (c). We therefore dismiss this appeal.
DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
