Testo completo
*Judge, U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by
designation.
**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
___________________________
No. 00-30797
___________________________
HARRY MENDOZA; ET AL,
Plaintiffs,
HARRY MENDOZA; NORVEL ORAZIO,
Plaintiffs-Appellees.
VERSUS
THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; ET AL,
THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS,
Defendant-Appellant.
___________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Louisiana
98-CV-2868-J
___________________________________________________
January 5, 2001
Before JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI*, Judge.
PER CURIAM:**
Appellants challenge the district court’s interpretation of
the consent decree at issue in this case. For the reasons stated
by the district court in its order of May 31, 2000, we agree with
-- 1 of 2 --
2
the district court’s interpretation of the consent decree and
AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Appellee’s motions0 to
supplement the record, to strike a portion of the brief, and to
strike the record are hereby DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
