Testo completo
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 00-30167
Summary Calendar
_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TIMOTHY RAY TURPEAU,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 6:98-CR-60030-12
_________________________________________________________________
October 9, 2000
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Timothy Ray Turpeau’s court-appointed attorney has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Turpeau has received a copy of
counsel’s brief and motion and has filed a pro se response.
Our independent review of the brief, the record, and Turpeau’s
response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
-- 1 of 2 --
2
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2. Turpeau’s requests for new counsel or, alternatively, an
extension of time to file a pro se brief are DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
