Testo completo
* Judge King did not participate in consideration of this
case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 46(d)(1994).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7627
DIMIDROFF HALEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOHN FANELLO,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CA-99-450, CR-92-20)
Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, * Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dimidroff Haley, Appellant Pro Se. John Kirk Brandfass, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia; Kate L.
Mershimer, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Dimidroff Haley appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recom-
mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Haley v. Fanello, Nos. CA-99-450; CR-92-20 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 10,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
