James M. Thompson v. Pete’s Brewing Company

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2647
JAMES M. THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PETE’S BREWING COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98-
1907-MJG)
Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 3, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James M. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Burton John Fishman, OGLETREE,
DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK, & STEWART, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Thompson apparently has filed in the district court a motion
to supplement the record on appeal. Because this motion is not
before this court, we decline to act on it.
2
PER CURIAM:
James M. Thompson appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief in Thompson’s age discrimination in employment action and
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *
See Thompson v. Pete’s Brewing Co., No. CA-98-1907-MJG (D. Md. Oct.
27 & Nov. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --