Alfutir Kareem Ideen Mayweather v. W. DAVID GUICE, Commissioner, Department of Public Safety NC, Official

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6299

ALFUTIR KAREEM IDEEN MAYWEATHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

W. DAVID GUICE, Commissioner, Department of Public Safety NC, Official and
Individual Capacity; GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director, Department of Public
Safety NC, Official and Individual Capacity; CAPTAIN AUER, Security Risk
Group Captain, Hyde Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity;
OFFICER LOCKLEAR, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Hyde Correctional Institute,
Official and Individual Capacity; G. SWINK, Programs Director, Marion
Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity; LIEUTENANT BANKS,
Shipping and Receiving, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual
Capacity,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

SERGEANT SPENCER, Investigating Officer, Hyde Correctional Institute, Official
and Individual Capacity; H. CORPENING, Correctional Administrator, Marion
Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity; J. JENKINS, Correctional
Planner, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity; KEITH
TURNER, Unit Manager, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual
Capacity; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, Hyde Correctional Institute, Official
and Individual Capacity,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-00100-FDW)

2

Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: May 22, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfutir Kareem Ideen Mayweather, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Ryan Williams, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

3

PER CURIAM:
Alfutir Kareem Ideen Mayweather appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendants in his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018),
confining his appeal to the district court’s denial of relief on his claim for denial of access
to the courts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mayweather v. Guice,
No. 1:17-cv-00100-FDW (W.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2020). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED