Brenda Coleman Gillis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1426

BRENDA COLEMAN GILLIS,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MERS AND WELLS FARGO HOME
MORTGAGE, d/b/a America’s Servicing Company, a division of Wells Fargo Bank,
NA; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, As Trustee for First
Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF11 Mortgage Pass Through Certificate-Series
2006, FFII; THE LAW OFFICE OF SAMUEL I. WHITE PC, (Specialized Loan
Servicing LLC); WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, (Wells Fargo &
MERS); ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES; JULIE ANN EVASCO, Esq.; SARA
TUSSEY, Esq.; KAREN E.M. PERRY, Esq.; SHAPIRO & BROWN, LLP &
PROFESSIONAL FORECLOSURE CORPORATION OF VIRGINIA; LENARD
TEGNACO, Esq.; SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, As servicing agent for
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, As Trustee for First Franklin Mortgage
Loan Trust 2006-FF11 Mortgage Pass Through Certificate-Series 2006, FFII;
MERS, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.,

Appellees,

and

SUZANNE E. WADE; JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III,

Trustees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:20-cv-00097-JAG)

2

Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: May 28, 2020

Before WYNN and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brenda Coleman Gillis, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey L. Tarkenton, WOMBLE BOND
DICKINSON (US) LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

3

PER CURIAM:
Brenda Coleman Gillis appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion
to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gillis v. Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., No. 3:20-cv-00097-JAG (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2020). We deny Gillis’ motion
for a temporary restraining order/stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED