United States of America v. Ernest Dailey

19-7677United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit11 giu 2020

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7677

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ERNEST DAILEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (7:14-cr-00072-BO-1)

Submitted: April 30, 2020 Decided: June 11, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Dailey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Ernest Dailey appeals the district court’s order denying Dailey’s motion for a
sentence reduction under § 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132
Stat. 5194, 5222. We affirm.
In 2015, Dailey pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute 28 grams or more
of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (2018), and possessing a
firearm in furtherance a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2018).
Dailey committed these offenses in March 2014. The district court correctly explained
that, because Dailey committed his offense after the Fair Sentencing Act took effect in
2010, Dailey’s offense is not a covered offense under § 404(a) of the First Step Act. See
United States v. Gravatt, 953 F.3d 258, 260 (4th Cir. 2020). We therefore affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.