Winifred Beasley v. Goodwin House Bailey’s Crossroads

19-1167Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 ott 2019

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1167
WINIFRED BEASLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GOODWIN HOUSE BAILEY’S CROSSROADS,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
NATASHA CHESSNOE, Salon Manager; LORI SIMPSON, Director Senior
Services; DANIELLE BROKENBURR, Human Resources; PAMELA CREWS,
Salon Stylist,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00837-LO-IDD)
Submitted: September 26, 2019 Decided: October 2, 2019
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Winifred Beasley, Appellant Pro Se. Linda U. Okoukoni, Amanda Vaccaro, JACKSON
LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Winifred Beasley appeals the district court’s order granting Goodwin House
Bailey’s Crossroads’ motion to dismiss Beasley’s claims that she was harassed, subjected
to retaliation and a hostile work environment, and constructively discharged because of her
race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2019). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Beasley v. Goodwin House Bailey’s Crossroads, No. 1:18-cv-00837-LO-IDD (E.D. Va.
Jan. 15, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.