Raheem L. Jones v. LIEUTENANT CURRY, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor

18-6077Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16 mar 2018

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6077
RAHEEM L. JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT CURRY, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; LIEUTENANT
DYSON, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; LIEUTENANT GRIFFEN,
Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BENZ, Pod
Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUDSON, Pod Officer; CORRECTIONAL
OFFICER LATIF, Pod Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MYRICK, Pod
Officer; LIEUTENANT ALLEN, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; MS. WITT,
Grievance Coordinator; GRANT, Unit Manager; TAMEKA JONES, Building
Counselor; MS. WILLIAM, Mental Health Counselor; NURSE MARLAND,
Medical Department; NURSE THIGPEN, Medical Department; NURSE
THWEATT, Medical Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01216-TSE-MSN)
Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Raheem L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Raheem L. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Jones v. Curry, No. 1:17-cv-01216-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 21,
2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.