Dmitry Pronin v. Lieutenant Troy Johnson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7562
DMITRY PRONIN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT TROY JOHNSON; OFFICER FLOURNOY; OFFICER
MIDDLEBROOK; OFFICER WILSON; OFFICER CRAWFORD; KENNETH
ATKINSON; DANIEL FALLEN; REX BLOCKER; LOUISA FUERTES-
RASARIO; SANDRA K. LATHROP; JAKE BURKETT; BRANDON BURKETT;
JOHN BRYANT; PATINA WALTON-GRIER; HENRI WALL; EDWARD
HAMPTON; WILLIAM JOHNSON; LIEUTENANT EDA OLIVERA-NEGRON,
Operations,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SHU STAFF MEMBERS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(5:12-cv-03416-DCN)
Submitted: February 16, 2017 Decided: February 22, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Dmitry Pronin, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Dmitry Pronin appeals the district court’s notice regarding
his right to respond to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
order Pronin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --