Jennifer D. Marshall; David C. Marshall v. Ethicon, Incorporated; Johnson & Johnson

16-1631Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21 nov 2016

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1631
JENNIFER D. MARSHALL; DAVID C. MARSHALL,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
ETHICON, INCORPORATED; JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin,
District Judge. (2:12-cv-02809; 2:12-md-02327)
Submitted: November 14, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tracy W. Houck, Ron Riggle, HOUCK & RIGGLE, LLC, Ruston,
Louisiana, for Appellants. David B. Thomas, Daniel R.
Higginbotham, THOMAS COMBS & SPANN, PLLC, Charleston, West
Virginia; Christy Jones, John C. Henegan, Sr., Susana Moore
Moldoveanu, BUTLER SNOW LLP, Ridgeland, Mississippi, for

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Jennifer D. and David C. Marshall appeal the district
court’s orders dismissing this action for failure to effect
timely service of process and denying their motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Marshall v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-cv-
02809, 2:12-md-92327 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 26 & May 27, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.